Wednesday, 29 July 2009

Criminals chartering children cronies?

News out of England indicate the trend of criminals chartering children-cronies to covert their nefarious tracks:
"...older criminals are involving children in gun and gang crime and using them to look after weapons." (From: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20090722/tuk-police-find-machine-gun-in-girl-s-wa-45dbed5_2.html)

Could this be why little Tecia Henry was throttled? (See: http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article?id=161493637)

Thus, also, why Prime Minister Manning said what he said at the People's National Movement Special Convention? (See: http://www.newsday.co.tt/politics/0,102505.html and http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article?id=161499178)

The Importance of Staying Alive.


Dear Prime Minister Manning,

Thank you for staying alive, as I quite agree with you that there'd have been visited upon us hapless Trinidadians and Tobagonians a horrendous bloodbath, had you, dimwittedly, allowed yourself to be taken out in July last year!

Your ever-grateful servant,
Richard Wm. Thomas,
who hails from Five Rivers, Arouca, a little village of east Trinidad and Tobago, a country that's staggering under the onerous dead-weight of the five hundred and fifty-plus corpses of Trinbagonians who've been murdered since the time the Prime Minister's saving grace was dispensed.

Tuesday, 28 July 2009

Beyond Mirery.

No one can arrive at a new destination without travelling a new road.

Monday, 27 July 2009

Singing poong-nah-nak!


Poong-nah-nak! Poong-nah-nak! Kiff kiff kiff! Poong-nah-nak! Poong-nah-urk-urk........!

What is joke to schoolchildren is death to crapaud. And, regarding the latest emolument package agreed for Parliamentary and Local Government officials, that comparison is now become even more gruesome, for the Salaries Review Commission --by it's 89th report-- has determined that "schoolchildren" are non-Ministerial Members of both Houses of Parliament and "crapaud", the Local Government Representatives --other than Mayors or Chairmen. Furthermore, it's determined that "joke" is the Travelling Allowance of the former bunch --TT$3,800.00 per month-- and "death", the salaries of the latter --TT$3,500.00 per month. In other words, Local Government Representatives, whose typical workday runs a minimum of fourteen hours, earn less than the statutorily-mandated minimum wage: they earn TT$8.22 per hour!

But, who cares? As long as the poong-nah-nak, poong-nah-nak continues, all's well, ain't it?

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

Chandroutie and Ronald.



Same flicking thing I said bout Chandroutie! Same flicking thing!

Russell, Karen, Clico, Central Bank, Lawsuit.


On June 7, 2009, the Trinidad Sunday Express reported:
FORENSIC investigator Robert Lindquist has uncovered what is being described as an elaborate scheme within the CL Financial Group, where annuities, with attractive returns, were being sold by insurance power house CLICO but that customers' investments were being funnelled for ghost services to the group...
CLICO's insurance agents, the Sunday Express was told, were rewarded with astronomical commissions to push the annuities which offered a 30 per cent return every year, far exceeding that offered by other insurance companies. (http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article_news?id=161487723)

In light of those revelations, what is one to make of this lawsuit that merry widow and co-architect of the Clico takeover, Finance Minister Karen Nunez-Tesheira, has filed against Gulf View Medical Centre, urologist Dr Lester Goetz and anaesthesiologist Dr Crisen Jendra Roopchand, in which she's claiming that she's entitled to the income from Clico he would've gotten had he not died, such income being what he mainly derived from commissions of his own sales and his share of what the 500 sales agents 'neath him sold?

More to come!

Monday, 20 July 2009

Is THIS why Gail did it?

Senator Gail Merhair recently abandoned her independence --in favour of the ruling party, the People's National Movement (PNM)-- to endorse that party's denial of the citizen's right to choose their elected representatives. (See: http://kid5rivers.blogspot.com/2009/07/grotesquely-mutating-gail-merhair_12.html) for the details.)

That was on July 8th, 2009.

Turns out that, before then --the Express hit the streets before midnight of July 7th and the Senate session began at 10 a.m. on July 8th-- she'd written and submitted an op-ed that was published in the Trinidad Express the very day she "Ayed!" with the PNM side in the Senate.

Turns out, too, that her op-ed led off with a question that, now, seems most germane to any discussing regarding why she voted how, then, she did. That question is:
Does corruption negatively impact upon how we do business? (See: http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article_business_mag?id=161501610)

Hmm!

Walter, Lara and Martin.


Dear Lara Picford-Gordon,

In your captioned article you opined:
I wonder where Walter Connell would be today if he did not come to PoS last Monday. On Wednesday he died of internal injuries from the gunshot wounds he received. So he has become another statistic in the crime data bank. Many people will think he got what he deserved and are not sympathetic.

Perhaps, Lara, you need stroll out of your cubicle and speak with your colleagues --Nalinee Seelal and Cecily Asson-- since,a mere seventy-two hours before you wrote your captioned story, they had this to report:
At the San Fernando home of Connell’s relatives, a woman yesterday apologised on behalf of the Connell family to the injured policeman and all other victims who suffered because of him. Requesting anonymity, the woman said, “I want to say on his behalf and on his family’s behalf, how sorry we all are for what he has done and for those he hurt. We heard that coming down to the end, he repented and we hope he has been accepted by the Lord.”

...The woman said that Connell’s family loved him despite all that he had done. “We never saw the bad side of him as all that he ever showed us was love.”
(http://www.newsday.co.tt/news/0,103910.html)

Ask me and i hazard the answer that, most likely, he'd have continued operating along the same lines as he did that fateful Monday, his family blissfully unaware --or blissfully ignoring-- that he was an out-and-out criminal.

But, God is The Most Merciful One...AND we, all, have faults. Walter paid with his life. If criminal activity is to be stopped or greatly diminished, some good people, too, have to sacrifice themselves for the good of all --not Martin Joseph's notion, okay? That's just the way it is.

Colm's continued cavalier constitutional calumnies.


That an elected legislator --who also happens to be a senior public official, a Cabinet Minister at that-- could, without fear of being scathed, declare that taxpayer's money would not be used to pay the wages or salaries of anyone who is known to hate the People's National Movement and that all such persons, if already employed would be fired --those are the implications of Colm Imbert's captioned statement-- reeks worse than Petrotrin Pointe-a-Pierre refinery on a blisteringly humid day, to say the least.

Colm's threats are calumnious, thus, against constitutional tenets affirming citizens their acknowledged rights, regardless of who they be, to join political parties and express political views, to associate and assemble as they wish and, too, to think and express themselves how it pleases them. Furthermore, the promised furture course of the Manning Administration --as made public by Colm-- is nothing but blackmail. And blackmail is a criminal offence.

Thing is, the same constitution also guarantees that such a blasphemer is protected from legal censure for what he said...except if the House agrees to strip him...of such protection. It should.

In the interim, nothing stands in the way of the Prime Minister kicking any such person's derrière out of Cabinet, ent?

But, given THAT man's past --ask Anand Ramlogan-- it's better to continue breathing as if nothing out of the ordinary occurred.

Concerning condemned childkiller Chandroutie's cancer.


In commenting on the current plight of condemned prisoner, Chandroutie London, the Trinidad Newsday mentioned that:
Chandroutie’s life is in imminent danger, said (her lawyer, in a) letter to the Prisons Commissioner that called on Rougier to “urgently transfer Ms London to a public health facility where she can receive treatment which the prison is unable to provide.”

The irony of it is that we, the people, must ensure condemned prisoners remain hale and hearty...the better to execute them.

Depends on the focus.


Dear Peter!

I was thoroughly enrapt by your captioned commentary --it was published in Trinidad and Tobago's Newsday of Sunday July 19, 2009. Then moved to respond as follows:

Despite this, there are many who unfussedly go about their daily chores of attending to others in a most altruistic manner: if they didn't, we'd not have food on the table, nor clothes to wear, nor houses in which to live. Each day I encounter a dozen or more persons --ordinary people, mostly-- who, despite the severity of the odds against them stacked, go over and beyond the call of duty to make things work, to help without seeking any or extra reward. These are the ones who, without being asked, spend of their meagre portion to "adopt" and or care for unwanted waifs, who conduct adult literacy/numeracy classes, stop to help if they see a car mechanically-disabled alongside the roadways. There are teachers who dip in their pockets to provide accroutements to children whose parents or guardian simply can't.

It is such persons who need be indentified and thrust, by popular acclaim, into the seats whence policy is shaped and implemented --like the USA has recently shown.

Yes! The improbable can happen! In Trinbago's case, it will when the right person grasps Excalibur's hilt. That person already exists...thing is, she hasn't yet realized how essential it is to move away from the old way of politics and carve the new. A little revisitng of Shakespeare might spur her forward to do what Fate for her has ordained:
"there is a tide n the affairs of men Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries."

Hope, that august quality without which we're doomed, promises that, sooner, rather than later, she will. Cryptically: August is the months when floods overtake us.

Therefore, let's wait a little while...and hope that maybe, 2009 would be the year when things begin to happen in that regard.

Saturday, 18 July 2009

Oh wow, Newsday!

In referring to the lineage of the late radio and television announcer, Melina Scott, the Trinidad Newsday took pains to describe her as wholly and solely "half-English". (See: http://www.newsday.co.tt/news/0,103957.html)

That means she and most of her colleagues present-day colleagues share the same patria mater --to grasp the full import, just tune in to any station and listen to the verdant verbosity very voiced via them with very high frequency.

May God be merciful to Melina's soul!

Friday, 17 July 2009

HCF=LCM.

First, to School!
Highest Common Factor (HCF) and Lowest Common Multiple (LCM) are terminologies which describe extrapolations derived from the application of certain mathematical laws.

Now! The HCF is the largest whole number that divides evenly into two (or more) numbers, or, better put, it's the largest of all the common factors of two (or more) different numbers. Thus, regarding 15 and 27 --the number, in that order, of seats the UNC and the PNM hold in the House of representatives, the HCF is 3. Yes! The PNM squad has 27: the Speaker is the PNM's wild card, NOT the UNC's!

On the other hand, the Lowest Common Multiple (LCM) is the smallest whole number into which each of two (or more) different numbers can evenly be divided. Thus, regarding the same 15 and 27, the LCM is 135.

It's wholly impossible for the same set of numbers to generate the identical number both as its HCF and LCM.

All this in buildup to a wholly-unrelated bit of deciphering: trying to figure out what in tarnation does the Manning administration have against Indo-Trinbagonians? Also, what do the courts have against the same set of our citizens?

The Evidence.
On July 8, 2009, evidently extremely elucidated by the apposite arguments attorney Anand advanced, a brace of Appeal Court panels --one comprising Justices Margot Warner, Wendell Kangaloo and Allan Mendonca, the other, Chief Justice Ivor Archie and Justices Warner and Mendonca-- handed Prime Minister Manning "a double blow" --that's how the Trinbago print media described it, not me!-- when they found in favour of Anand's clients, Feroza Ramjohn and Ganga Persad-Kissoon. Both Feroza and Ganga are of Indo heritage and both long-serving --long-suffering, too-- public servants who had worked and studied their way up the ranks, only to be denied the promotion that, in essence, the court ruled was rightfully theirs by their such dint. (See: http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article?id=161502114, http://www.newsday.co.tt/news/0,103443.html and http://guardian.co.tt/news/general/2009/07/10/public-servants-win-appeal-court)

The culpable? Prime Minister Manning --first, he'd used his veto power to deny them, then, he held it back so that Non-Indo-Trinbagonians could squeeze into the plum positions.

Then, before the ink on those two decisions had properly dried, yet another glaring example of egregious oversight by another public institution --yet again the Public Se vice Commission. This time, the PSC turned its nose up at and blanked Harridath Maharaj, the public officer who, for many months, without blemish, had been acting in the vacant Transport Commissioner post and whom all, thus, expected would have been confirmed in the job. Instead, one Reuben Cato was given the nod. Reuben Cato is NOT an Indo-Trinbagonian. (See: http://www.newsday.co.tt/crime_and_court/0,103917.html)

What does the future hold?
No nation which implements and abides by unjust laws for long shall stand --that's my quote, so forget about binging it! The cords which still together --but barely-- bind Trinbago as a cohesive whole, will sooner, rather than later, unless real pressure is brought to bear upon the Prime Minister and his administration, completely unravel. Such unravelling has already begun --just look at the murder rate, how it's escalating as those in charge poops down the place, blaming their lapsing on "senior moments" and at the horrendous success rate of the national education system.

Action to bring a halt to the madness must come swiftly and so only from the institution that's charged with ensuring justice prevails: the courts of law. Sadly, those sitting in the seats of justice seem not aware of their awesome responsibilities and powers, else they'd've been furnishing copious proof that so they did. By, such as, in the very decisions abovementioned, administering stinging slaps to the face, not on the wrists, of the guilty and by dishing out the deserved reward to the injured. How? By ordering the at-once rescission of the unjust appointments, then bestowing the aggrieved with exemplary damages for their pain and suffering.

In any event, it's more than past time for ALL public service interviewing panels to be composed in a way which reflects the multi-ethnicity of the broader society, as it's as similarly-untenable for an Indo-Trinbagonian to have to face a battery of Non-Indo-Trinbagonians as it is for a Non-Indo-Trinbagonian to face a team comprised of Indo-Trinbagonians.

Justice must not seem to be done, but done! My quote again.

Back to School!
This treatise began by using the HCF and LCM analogies in asking whether the Manning administration and local courts have something stuck in their craws regarding Indo-Trinbagonians, for HCF could never be equal to LCM, where the same set of numbers is concerned. It's clear --and so sad-- that the answer is yes. Look at all three cases and see that the HCF is Prime Minister Manning plus the courts, so, too, the LCM: Manning, the devious instigator and the courts, the hand wringer instead of bold dispenser of proper redress. HCF=LCM, QED!

Epilogue.
As this essay tapers, a gentle once-again prod to the local media: bring the news to the public! In this instance, the abovementioned judgements can easily be broadcast both in the printed media and online.

Here endeth.

So, what's the point, Milady?


"Justice Maureen Rajnauth Lee ruled that it was unfair and irrational that the present Transport Commissioner Reuben Cato, was promoted to the post though he was Motor Vehicle Inspector (MVT) 1 while Maharaj was MVT 11 and had acted as TC for 15 months...

However, Cato will continue to hold the position of TC because the judge stated that it was not prudent in the public interest to quash his promotion...

Rajnauth Lee ruled that the commission failed to consider Maharaj’s qualifications and experience and the decision not to interview him for the post, was unfair and irrational.

In her ruling, the judge stated that the commission must be guided that in the spirit of fairness, it must inform Maharaj that it was deviating from established practice in making the appointment.

The judge did not award damages to Maharaj."

So, what's the point, Milady? Is the judgement meant merely to give Maharaj a moral and spiritual victory? And, is it also meant to encourage us henceforth to regard the incumbent Transport Commissioner as the product of irrationality? Over to you, Milady!

Martin Joseph's "senior moment".


When I heard that Security Minister, Martin Joseph, had had a "senior moment" during the yesterday's post-Cabinet briefing, I jumped for joy, then fell prostrate giving praise and thanks to The Almighty One for getting rid of one of the worst blights to have ever been visited upon us

I came back to Earth with a thud when it was explained I'd wrongly digested what my auditory sense had intercepted: the man really had one of those moments of utter hopelessness and helplessness that mostly senior citizens from time-to-time experience --when they forget who, what, where they are-- and NOT a moment of nostalgia that follows upon someone uttering " I'll be seeing ya!" as they made their long overdue exit off the stage.

Wednesday, 15 July 2009

Where's Obama's Bed?

I keep hearing these rumours that US President, Barack Obama, never slept in Trinidad and or Tobago while he attended the Fifth Summit of The Americas, but that, because of US Secret Service's great and deep mistrust of our own security forces, instead, he slept in Barbados. Like I said, I keep hearing these rumours. Given that he ate or drank not what was not brought in from America when he came, those rumours need examining...or shredding if untrue. Guess I can protest that, being titled as I am, I won't believe until I see the bed in Hilton 'pon which , actually, he slept, wrinkles and all.

Forgetting about history is a perilous course.

One man stood up one February day three years ago and raised the ire of quite a few in a Chaguanas crowd by declaring how warily he was watching a certain individual who, not long before that, had been welcomed back into a house after he'd, single-handedly, almost utterly, wrecked it. For such a stance that one man was there and then by quite a few booed, yet, unfazed, onwards he soldiered. It took three years for the cycle to complete, now, those who, then, upon that one man heaped scorn, have about-turned to join him in his long, wary vigil of the the certain individual.

What, then, to make of the two sets of events, other than to ponder that forgetting about history is a perilous course and that everyone has their place in the historical scheme of things?

http://www.newsday.co.tt/news/0,34732.html
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article_archive?id=137406729

Put up! Or continue to suck up!

Why are you fuming, fussing, fretting, fidgeting, whatever, over what Prime Minister Manning said of you? And, before I continue, how come --from the best checks I've been able to do-- ONLY ONE of you --the Trinidad Guardian-- even mentioned what he said? And, even so, in passing? Yep! Only the Guardian said anything --at http://guardian.co.tt/news/politics/2009/07/14/media-not-performing-proper-role-manning-- in the following two sentences:
Manning said the role of the media was to educate and inform. He was not sure the media here was performing its proper role.

Mind you! That's the sum of it, though the article's blazing headline was:
Media not performing proper role—Manning

and though, immediately after the above two sentences, you mentioned what next --ne presumes-- he said:
He said the PNM would not lose at the polls again under his leadership. “It ain’t going to happen again.”

The second prime-ministerial comment is far more ominous than his appraisal of your performance. Why? Rock back and listen!
  1. It could mean that Manning, in particular, has learnt well from the two occasions that the PNM was defeated in General Elections, while political leaders of other parties have not --which, indeed, would be a fine thing, but, only from the PNM's Manningy perspective; and, or.
  2. that some inducement was given to then President, Arthur N. R. Robinson, to de-select Prime Minister Panday back on Christmas Eve 2001 --in the face of the United National Congress gaining half of the contested seats and more than half of the popular vote; and, or,
  3. that the PNM won the 2002 and 2007 General Elections by prestidigitation; and, or,
  4. that, in future, he and his cronies shall ensure every election is rigged in PNM's favour.
Regardless, a properly-performing, public-protecting watchdog --which is what the Trinbagonian media's meant to be, but is not-- would have on that latter statement, instead, seized, then do to the Prime Minister what he boasted of doing to Attorney-General Jeremie's letter of resignation --rip him to shreds!

But, then, who am I fooling? Even though their are some individual media professionals who strive their best to bring the truth through the froth, as a rule the Trinbagonian media would never step up to the plate to call out the Prime Minister and his cronies for what, really, they are: not as long as the Trinidad Media relies on the advertising dollars, nor as long as some of those same cronies are the ones who own such media houses, therefore can, by a mere phone call, order a Managing Editor to suck up to whomever to safeguard or increase the flow of those dollars. (See also: http://kid5rivers.blogspot.com/2008/01/dear-editorsheads-of-news-trinidad-and.html)

Sunday, 12 July 2009

Yes, Privy Council, yes!

Can't understand how it's a good thing to stretch half/three-quarter way around the globe to get people to dig foundations for our buildings, people for whom we have to get interpreters if we want to converse with them, but a bad thing, when it come to interpreting we laws, to stick with people in Merrie Old England whose laws we use as the foundation on which we built ours.

Dey kill Judy!!!

Dis have no punctuation marks cause ah want to show by leaving dem out how intolerable life is dese days in once-sweet Trinbago where bodies falling every day like rainfly wing does do when the sun come out Just after midday dey came the people say Two ah dem Youths Black hen chicken Both armed Silently intent Bloodthirst in their eyes To Judy's shop by the junction See de pitures I take and attach She was alone in dey from what ah hear So in dey dey went Two ah dem Youths Black hen chicken Both armed Silently intent Bloodthirst in their eyes Whatever dem and Judy talk bout Judy take wit she to de grave because from what we hear so far dey didn't touch nottehn from de shop except take two bag ah hops Two ah dem Youths Black hen chicken Both armed Silently intent Bloodthirst in their eyes Dey shoot she once Two ah dem Youths Black hen chicken Both armed Silently intent Bloodthirst in their eyes She must be bawl out ogod ah sure cause ah hear de first shot ketch she in she back Den dey shoot she in she head Two ah dem Youths Black hen chicken Both armed Silently intent Bloodthirst in their eyes Dat had to be cause dey wanted to make sure she dead Den dey run down de road and escape in a waiting vehicle Two ah dem Youths Black hen chicken Both armed Silently intent Bloodthirst in their eyes Was jus yesterday I talk to Judy I stop dey to buy some bread and juice and ting We make joke as we always used to do Ah tell she she not properly dressed fuh business wit de short pants she had on She say alright nah Ah go change into someting more decent And we talk bout de chirren as usual Judy was a determined woman All business She run she mini-mart she one alone since she daughter Melissa real nice girl did get kill and she next daughter Suemara get she foot chop off clean by a raving madman early one morning exactly three years and one week ago Now Judy is no more She shop is no more too We go miss you Judy And we pray to God to give you rest You didn deserve to die de way you did We de people must put ah stop to de wanton bloodletting since de govahment eh care shyte bout doing what dey must to stop more like dese two youths Black hen chicken intent Bloodthirst in their eyes

Clueless Gail.

Senator Gail Merhair's proffered defence --that her "constitutional lawyer" advised her of rapidly-following constitutional crisis, were the bill to extend the life of Local Government bodies defeated-- shows how clueless both she and her fictititious attorney are, in that, had what they feared occurred, the local government elections would have had to have been set for, at latest, October 12th, 2009, that's all.

That she's an Independent Senator, is public knowledge. That the one who selected and appointed her as one regularly mucks up such his duties is also public knowledge. Dots may, correctly, thus, be connected.

Jumping Jehosaphat! John Jeremie's Joking!

If I were Prime Minister Patrick Manning, I'd simply rock back and muse, 'Hey! These Trinis are real dumb sons and daughters, inno? Imagine, they let me get away with anything! So! Know what? I'll stick it to them again: I'll accept John's resignation and kick him upstairs to the Presidency. That way, I'll kill two birds with one stone:
  1. Show that I respect the Law Association's opinion --they have no confidence in John as AG...they didn't say anything about as President. And,
  2. Show that I respect the popular wish that Max should exit the scene. Max eh go mind since ah done fix up he Golden Handshake package.
Ah yes! If wishes were horses, eh?

Grotesquely mutating Gail Merhair, goodness me!

Just who is this Gail Merhair, who, on July 8th 2009, cast her independent lot in amongst that of those politicians hell-bent on denying the good citizens their constitutional rights? Perhaps her record over the years in the august Senate may enlighten as to who she was and how she was thinking, before so she voted?

Gail Merhair embarked on her senatorial journey by enlightening all as to which beacon would, throughout such odyssey, guide her:
"Mr. President, I rise to make my maiden contribution to this honourable Senate with a sense of humility and optimism. Much has been said about parliaments across the world. The late George Bernard Shaw, Irish literary critic and Nobel laureate for literature, 1925, said that, and I quote:
“Better a leader of fabianism than a chorus man in Parliament.”
Even Thomas Carlyse, Scottish historian said that:
“Parliament will train you to talk and above all things, hear with patience unlimited quantities of foolish talk.”
Let it be clear that I do not share the skepticism (sic) of some. I believe that all Members of this honourable Senate enter here with the determination to provide the best representation of the people. I now commit myself to do so and to serve the people of Trinidad and Tobago..."

(Tuesday January 22, 2008...between 12:30am and 12:45am..in the Senate, debating the Finance Supplementary Appropriation (2007) Bill [pg. 463 Hansard http://ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20080122.pdf])

Thus, one expected her forever to wield the Independent sword in her hand to smite any who ventured to assail the people of Trinidad and Tobago. Let continued examination of the Hansard reveal whether, since that solemn declaration, she has stayed true to her sworn course, or whether she had mutated into someone whose July 8th 2009 late night vote in support of the fourth postponement of Local Government Elections ought not to have surprised anyone at all.

Here goes!
"...Trust and confidence, I reiterate is what is needed, and citizens are looking to Members of the honourable Senate to provide that solution. Let us move forward and in the interest of the people, to stabilize the situation, we not only need to do it right, but we also need to get it right..."

(Friday February 6, 2009...between 12:05am and 12:35am...in the Senate, debating the Central Bank (Amendment) Bill, 2009 [pg. 497 Hansard http://www.ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20090205.pdf])

Excellent! Excellent!

Moving on!
"...I want to pay particular attention to...the moral aspect (of this Bill). I am particularly concerned with how this Bill, after it is passed, is going to make a difference to the people of Trinidad and Tobago..."

(Tuesday February 12, 2008...between 4:00pm and 4:15pm...in the Senate, debating the Copyright Amendment Bill [pg. 355 Hansard http://www.ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20080212.pdf])

Marvellous, for it paints a picture of a legislator whose heart is in the right place, ent? Moving on!

"...we do live in a democratic society and each citizen must be allowed to share his or her own grievances.

(Tuesday April 8, 2008...between 18:00pm and 8:45pm...in the Senate, debating the Caribbean Court of Justice Headquarters Bill [pg. 183 Hansard http://www.ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20080408.pdf]);

and
"...People must be able to determine, not only their future, but also their destiny..."

(Tuesday April 8, 2008...between 18:00pm and 8:45pm...in the Senate, debating the Caribbean Court of Justice Headquarters Bill [pg. 189 Hansard ibid])

Bravo! Bravo! Very good! Well-said! If anything, that snippet tends powerfully to suggest otherwise to what actually Gail did on the night of July 8th 2009, ent?

Moving on!
"...I would like to urge Senators that whatever we do here, we should do it in the interest of the people of Trinidad and Tobago. It is in that regard, I support the views shared by my Independent colleagues, and urge the Government to rethink what has been proposed.

Mr. President, I thank you."

(Tuesday April 29, 2008...between 8:30pm and 8:45pm..in the Senate, debating the Appointment of Joint Select Committees Bill [pg. 463 Hansard http://www.ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20080429.pdf])

She seemed there to be holding steady and true, ent? So! Again! Nothing there to hint that she would have wined her waist how she did, late that July 8th 2009 night, ent?

Moving on!
"...Mr. President, Trinidad and Tobago must in fact follow the example set by Canada in ensuring the rights of citizens of this country..."


(Tuesday May 13, 2008...between 3:15pm and 3:30pm...in the Senate, debating the Immigration (Advance Passenger Information) Bill, 2008 [pg. 591 Hansard http://ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20080513.pdf])

A blanket statement, regardless of context, therefore harbingering of an entirely different course of action to the one she took that late July 8th 2009 night, ent?

Moving on!
"Mr. President, a society that thinks the choice between ways of living, is just a choice between ways of eligible lifestyles, turns universities into academic cafeterias offering junk food for the mind. According to George Will, “Politicians fascinate because they are an elite that accomplishes mediocrity for the public good.”

When I read this Bill...several immediate objections were raised in my mind. At the end of examining the issue, I must state that I cannot support this legislation as a matter of principle. It took my mind back to something said by John Stuart Mill and that is: “The general tendency of things throughout the world is to render mediocrity, the ascendant power among mankind.” Hon. Senators, this Bill is a reflection of mediocrity throughout and should not be tolerated. Enough, sometimes they say, is enough!

The Bill seeks to amend the Accreditation Council of Trinidad and Tobago Act, Chapter 39:06 to extend the transitional period from four years to five years and to allow for provisional registration. As far as I am concerned, four years since the passage of this Act and the ongoing training seminars that were conducted by the Accreditation Council and the Ministry of Science, Technology and Tertiary Education is more than enough time to have this system formalized and institutionalized, as intended. If schools and institutions are still in need of more time to have themselves registered and accredited, then, they have no business in providing tertiary education for the youths and citizens of Trinidad and Tobago.

This matter has a long-standing history. There have been several attempts over the past 34 years or so, to establish a system for the recognition of institutions of higher education in Trinidad and Tobago for the accreditation of programmes.

...All that set aside, the Government must be commended for pursuing the issue with some vigour once again. I state categorically that I am against any additional period being added for the purpose of this transition to accreditation. Even with a conservative estimate, it is my understanding that the Accreditation Council, together with the Ministry of Education, has been working assiduously over the last two years to move the process along. If after all this time, some schools have not been brought up to standard, then, with all due respect to this honourable Senate, they should be closed down. This Bill can be seen as an attempt to allow delinquent institutions to dictate the pace of progress and development. This must not be allowed to happen. Why is it so hard for some of these institutions to come up to scratch?

...Our local institutions have had four years to come up to scratch. I see no need for any additional time. This will lead to the perpetuation of mediocrity. If they do not come up to scratch, I think that they should be closed down..."


(Tuesday July 1, 2008...between 6:10pm and 6:25pm..in the Senate, debating the Accreditation Council of Trinidad and Tobago Amendment Bill [pg. 403 Hansard http://www.ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20080701.pdf])

And, as the saying goes, "What's good for the goose is good for the gander!" So, change the words "Accreditation Council" to "County/City Council" and her line of reasoning would still be applicable. Hence, again, nothing there to suggest that Gail would have wailed down the place as she did late that July 8th 2009 night, ent?

Moving on!
"Mr. Vice-President, I rise in this my first contribution in the Senate on the Appropriation Bill for fiscal 2008/2009. I have taken cognizance of all the contributions that came before me and wish to congratulate everybody who spoke before me and also congratulate all this morning so that we can get on with the people’s business.

...my contribution...is an opportunity to provide my recommendations...solely...as an alternative as to what was offered by the Minister...in the other place...and to be accepted or criticized within the same spirit..."

(Tuesday October 8, 2008...between 11:50am and 12:35pm..in the Senate, debating the Appropriation Bill 2009 [pg. 296 Hansard http://www.ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20081008.pdf])

Rightoh! Again, the determined focus on seeing after the people's business and of using her platform to develop and present a voice independent of what is parroted by government senators, ent?

Moving on!
"...I stand here today not only as an Independent Senator, but also as an aggrieved citizen of Trinidad and Tobago, demonstrating my frustration at a level of malaise that has been allowed to flourish for far too long..."

(Tuesday December 2, 2008...between 8:45pm and 9:15pm..in the Senate, debating the Financial Institutions Bill 2009 [pg. 296 Hansard http://ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20081202.pdf])

That utterance speaks volumes, so, to it, nothing more need be added.

Moving on!
"...I think the time for argument from political principle is over; we are dealing with Trinidad and Tobago here..."

(Friday February 6, 2009...between 12:05pm and 9:15pm..in the Senate, debating the Insurance (Amendment) Bill 2009 [pg. 498 Hansard http://ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20090205.pdf])

Which is how Senators, especially Independent Senators, are supposed to be guided, ent?

Moving on!
"...And through you, Mr. President, I would also like to ask the Hon. Minister...why has something not been done? Why have we not been told what are the recommendations? This Government and the country spent an amount of money in having an enquiry. Where are the recommendations? Are they going to be implemented? Are they not going to be implemented? When are they going to be implemented, if at all; if it was a waste of time?

This Bill causes too many questions than answers. To me, it is not only bureaucratic, but in terms of accountability and transparency there is none. There is none! We cannot give persons, through legislation, to just handle the free flow of Trinidad and Tobago, and it will be in the best interest of the hon. Minister...not to bind himself into all this type of responsibility. The Minister is responsible for appointing, reviewing the terms and conditions, ...and revoking appointments. In all honesty, I really do not think—with the importance of the...sector in Trinidad and Tobago—the Hon. Minister of Health has time to do this. There is no time. There are more important matters that the Minister...needs to attend to in the interest of the people of Trinidad and Tobago. I think this Bill in its present form, I honestly cannot stand here and support it.

I think it is too much; we are trying to do too many things with this legislation. I am looking at the Bill and I am seeing three or four pieces of legislation coming out of it, so probably we need to take it back to the drawing board, put a joint select committee, something to make the legislation more in tune to the needs of the people of Trinidad and Tobago. It is too much and there is too much parallel, and I think if we really care about the people of Trinidad and Tobago—and I know that you do, hon. Minister as well as other people in this Parliament—then we should get it right, do it right in the interest of the people of Trinidad and Tobago, because this Bill in its present form is a greater injustice to the people of Trinidad and Tobago.

Mr. President, I thank you."


(Tuesday March 3, 2009...between 3:45pm and 4:15pm...in the Senate, debating the The Emergency Ambulance Services and Emergency Medical Personnel Bill, 2009 [pg. 714 Hansard http://www.ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20090303.pdf])

Now! If THAt doesn't suggest a Gail naysaying of further postponement of Local Government Elections, what does?

Then this, to take the cake:
"...Allow me to quote from an article published in the Trinidad Guardian dated April 15, 2009, entitled “T&T gets bad rating” and I quote:
“Active Democracy Citizen Network (ADCN), made up of representatives of 21 countries, has given Trinidad and Tobago a bad rating for nonimplementation of decisions from previous Summits of the Americas.

The results were derived from considerations over 2006—2008 of the following points, among others:
  • Local government reform process that is moving more in the direction of centralization rather than decentralization, reduced autonomy and funding for local government authorities; three-times postponement of local government elections;”
Mr. Vice President, I think this is a clear indication of this country’s local government reform process coming on the heels of hosting the 5th Summit of the Americas.

...So, the question begs, what is the purpose of all this effort of local government (reform) when, in fact, what we are doing is moving away from a decentralized system to a centralized system? It is rather contradictory. The local regional authorities should be left with the opportunity to give final approval in their respective areas. I think that the local corporations must be allowed to demonstrate to citizens within their bodies what is happening and what is meant by achieving continuous improvement for their areas. I think the process is so designed.

...I think what should have happened in this instance is that the Government should have brought legislation to strengthen the powers of the Auditor General’s Department, and to let the public know whether the best value for money is being achieved. This should be done in areas where we need to get best value for our money that is being spent. We need to have a body to inspect what is happening with the citizens’ money. The Government needs to see how well the policies are working on the ground. We also need to identify the areas that we are failing in and take the necessary action, and we need to get best practice and policies in place.

...I think that the answer to our problems is to bring all public officials into account in terms of transparency, accountability; get the system right; make the system work, and not transfer the problem from one area to another..."

(Tuesday May 5, 2009...between 5:15pm and 5:45pm...in the Senate, debating the The Trinidad and Tobago Electricity Commission (Amendment) Bill, 2009 [pg. 155 Hansard http://www.ttparliament.org/hansards/hs20090505.pdf])

There may have been some comments overlooked, but, given the above, what further proof does one need reasonably to conclude that, in the run-up to her late July 8th 2009 vote, Senator Gail Merhair was utterly opposed to any extension of the life of the Local Government bodies except as a result of free and fair and long-overdue elections? It's clear, then, that, despite her protestations to the contrary, some intoxicatingly-irresistible inducement indeed was given her to make her vote the way she did --as a member of the chorus.

That's all, for now!

Saturday, 11 July 2009

"Papa Manning"? Or, "Mama Manning"?

It's said, "The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world!" It's also said, "Behind every successful man, there's a woman!" The essence of each adage, when blended, delivers a potent concoction: that, in large measure, who one is as an adult is determined by the nurturing and modelling one receives at the hands of one's mother.

On another tangent, one has to ask what is it that causes certain grown men to become euphoric whenever in the audience of children? For only euphoria could spur such persons to confess --by inference-- what of them had been previously whispered in the shadows --such as the Prime Minister did during his visit to the Dayanand Memorial Vedic School, when he spilled the beans that,
"The day he did not have a shirt he could not make this an excuse for not going to school as his mother found one of his sister's frilled blouses for him to wear..." (See: "Manning: I wore flour sack to school", by Nikita Braxton, Trinidad Express, July 11, 2009).

Right away, his blurt invites the irreverent to inquire, "Thenceforth, how shall he be hailed? As "Papa Manning"? Or, as "Mama Manning"?"

One strongly suspects that the latter'd be more appropriate, especially given that the Manningy prime ministerial modus operandi is more focused on the cosmetic than the substantial.

Friday, 10 July 2009

Let's do The Bundanoon, too!

In the Weekend Mirror of December 14th 2008, the following treatise of mine was published:


Down with plastic or styrotex bags, containers and packaging!

Whither we turn in this land over which God has given us charge, the unsavoury and disgusting sight of litter us confronts. Every time it rains, our drains, streams, rivers and coastlines instantly become clogged or covered with litter. We buy our soft drinks in disposable bottles or in disposable cups; when we are through drinking the contents, carelessly, thoughtlessly, aside we cast the empty containers: through our car windows, at the side of the road, on the pavement, in the drain, everywhere... except in a trash can.

Our official garbage trucks, crammed and overflowing, swerve through traffic, on their way to the nearest sanitary landfill, nonchalantly spilling, before they get to their destination, a quarter or more of their load onto our streets. Our unofficial garbage trucks don't do the sanitary landfill thingy at all: they simply head for the nearest empty lot, or river, or hillside and, like stray dogs in the middle of Queen's Park Oval while Lara is at bat, casually responding to Mother Nature's call, they there dump their offensive loads, without a care in, or for, the world for the disruption thereby caused.

Every morning, and every evening, for far too long, I've had the unpleasant and, therefore, unwelcome, task of collecting at least a bag of trash from the little part-grass, part-concrete roadside verge in front of my modest home: the carelessly, but deliberately, discarded KFC, Royal Castle or Churches Chicken boxes, most with the used, plastic fork and paper napkin thrown in (or, is it "thrown away"?) for good measure, the Tampico plastic bottles, the Fruta aluminum cans, the myriad printed cups, some paper, most, plastic or styrotex, but all from which some uncaring dolt once ate or drank and, having been sated, simply and wantonly jettisoned through any window of whatever passing restaurant that was somehow allowed by the Motor Vehicle Licensing Department to be cleverly-camouflaged-to-look-
like-a-maxi-or-some-other-vehicle.

Some mornings, at least five times per week I would say, my trash collection foray would include the scooping up the remains of some empty Carib, Stag, Smalta or Apple J bottle which, unlike the more resilient jetsam, had morphed into jagged-edge shards of glass having suffered a shattered demise against my front fencewall.

But nothing makes my blood boil more than the sight of the carelessly discarded plastic bag, regardless of its size! which brings me to the point:
"I wonder if any one of us has ever taken the time to reflect upon the magnitude of the innocuous-looking plastic bag's impact on our environment?"

Not being able to find any official information on the topic, at least of recent vintage, I resorted quietly to doing some research on this vexing topic by sample-monitoring the customer flow at two Hi-Lo supermarkets in west Trinidad -Starlite, in Four Roads, Diego Martin and, Westmoorings, near Westmall in Cocorite- for, like most supermarkets, groceries, shops, stores, pharmacies, fast food outlets, whatever, Hi-Lo chain is "one ah dem" plastic bag freaks! Thus, 99.99% of its customers' groceries are bagged in plastic, at the checkout counter.

From first hand -and four-eyed- observation, at both Hi-Lo locations combined, some five thousand purchasing customers pass through, every day, at least six days per week. And each customer has, on average, three bags of groceries. Need I remind you? In three plastic bags (or more: due to over-enthusiastic double-bagging). Indeed, some customers exit with so many plastic bags in hand, each containing just one, or two, items, that one would swear that it was plastic bags they bought!

That works out to be fifteen thousand plastic bags per day. That translates into, on average, ninety thousand bags per week.

Assuming that customer patronage remains the same for the entire year, we are talking about four million, six hundred and eighty bags per year!

Plastic bags!

And that is just Hi-Lo at those two west-Trinidad locations! And, nationwide, Hi-Lo has how many stores? And, nationwide, how many other stores are there that are not Hi-Lo? And market vendors? And,
ad nauseam?

Extrapolating from my Hi-Lo two-outlet survey, it's easy to conjecture that, in Trinidad alone, the total NUMBER OF PLASTIC BAGS GENERATED ANNUALLY from all sources (i.e. not only Hi-Lo) must, at least, be ONE BILLION! And, a billion of these bags would make a rope long enough to gird the globe four times.

Then, there's this: every single bag has ultimately to be discarded somewhere, doesn't it? Where? In the air? In outer space? On the bottom of the ocean? Where??? Moreover, even if every used plastic bag or disposable container is "properly disposed of"-which, in our neck of the woods, still means "buried in a sanitary landfill"- does anybody know how long it takes for such buried plastic garbage to decompose? Do YOU know?

Well, I'll tell you. Plastic takes a bloody long time to break down. In fact, IT TAKES OVER SIX HUNDRED YEARS FOR PLASTIC COMPLETELY TO DECOMPOSE! SIX HUNDRED YEARS GODDAMMIT!

That's why plastic, being what it is by its nature, should exclusively be used to manufacture goods which need to exist for a long, long time -such as, water lines- and not of/for goods of fleeting lifespan or usage -such as, grocery bags!

But, some may argue that these grocery bags are biodegradable. Heck, housewives would have experience on more than one occasion, a retrieved grocery bag crumbling to dust, as it were. Don't be fooled! Plastic is plastic! Thus, it cannot escape the verdict of the six hundred-year rule.

But, what, exactly, is the nature of plastic? That is best assessed by understanding its manufacturing process.

Plastic is made from ethylene. Ethylene is a by-product gas that forms when oil, gas and coal is refined. The gas -ethylene- in turn is refined and converted into polymers. Polymers are really strung-together ethylene molecules. A string of ethylene molecules is known as polyethylene (also called polyethene or polythene): poly is of Greek, meaning "many". The polythene, is compressed through an extruder into pellets -as spaghetti or dog chow also are- and sold to manufacturers of plastic products. And, the most pervasive use to which these pellets are put is in the manufacture of plastic bags.

It's necessary to note that plastic shopping bags come in mainly two densities:
  • the lighter, filmy bags used by supermarkets and other food outlets. These are made from high density polyethylene (HDPE); and,
  • the heavier, crinklier bags used by the likes of Detour, Catwalk etc, which may additionally have a reinforced handle, made of, yep! plastic! This type of plastic shopping bag is made from a different type of plastic called "low density polyethylene" (LDPE)
Guess you might have already been telling yourself, "Wait! this sounds like cholesterol: High Density Lipid (HDL) and Low Density Lipid (LDL): the one good, the other, bad?"

Well, if you were, you're on the right course, only that the LDPE is the "good polythene" if, ever, there could be such, in that, in two strings of similar length, there would be less ethylene molecules in the one that's of LDPE string than the other that's of HDPE. LDPE, therefore, is more flexible than its very rigid its badjohn twin, a fact which determines which PE will be used for what.

Hi-Lo's shopping bags, like most grocery shopping bags, are made of HDPE. and HDPE is plastic. And, as said before, "Plastic is plastic! Thus, it cannot escape the verdict of the six hundred-year rule."

I, therefore, say: IT IS TIME TO BAN THE USE OF PLASTIC BAGS AND STYROTEX CONTAINERS FOR THE PURPOSES OF PACKING AND TRANSPORTING RETAIL GOODS!

How so? Very easily! By slapping the consumer with a punitive Environment Tax whenever he or she opts to have their purchased stuff thus packaged. This would in turn immediately force all vendors to turn green when it comes to packaging and bagging goods sold, for customers, for their part, would have no recourse but to return to the habits of bygone days, when it was common practice for a household to use the same shopping bags over and over because they were bags that lasted a long, long time due to the type of material of which they were made. Or, to walk with your bowl when buying take-away meals. Or, for inhouse diners to be served their repasts on chinaware platters.

In addition, the revenue collected by way of such tax would assist tremendously in the restoration of our environment.

Ireland has shown the way in this regard, her government having imposed a "plastax" of fifteen cents (
9p) per bag. Yes! Per bag! To be charged and collected by the retailer that hands out the bag to the customer. That was on Monday March 4, 2002. Within five months of introducing that tax, use of plastic shopping bags by the Irish fell by, get this! ninety percent! Ninety percent! During which time, those reluctant Irish who remained insistent on using plastic shopping bags, forked out over €3.5 million in plastax. (See: "Shoppers face plastic bag tax", at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1853305.stm and, "Irish bag tax hailed success", at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2205419.stm)

The question remains: can this finite, little land space of ours sustain this plastic onslaught for much longer? Or do we have scientifically thought-out and implemented programmes in place to deal with this endless stream of disposable plastic.

Whether we have yet so done or not, I believe and therefore I suggest that action has to be taken, NOW! to curb this runaway menace to our environment, and ourselves.

Surely, for the future sake of our environment, as a start, the Irish solution is worthy of implementation?

Richard Wm. Thomas,
Five Rivers,
Arouca,
Trinidad and Tobago.
kid5rivers.com



Now, news is had of the Australian town of Bundanoon --which is Aboriginal for "Place of Deep Gullies"; its population is 2,100-- that has taken the almost unanimous step of banning bottled water! Only two residents voted against the measure --one of them worked for a bottled water company. (See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8141569.stm)

No surprise, then, for me again to shout, but now with a twist, "Let's do the Bundanoon, too!"

Stonewalling reparation.

The urine flowed copiously on Michael A Dingwall's disquisition regarding reparation, which was published in the Trinidad Newsday on July 10, 2009 as a letter to the Editor. And nothing less it deserved, he having therein pontificated, inter alia, that:
  • the principle of retroactive justice is irrelevant when analysing history
  • the Africans who were selling out their own saw nothing wrong with what they were doing and the Europeans certainly were not losing any sleep about the morality of what they were doing – how can there be any injustice here?
  • Also, it must be noted that nothing was wrong with the treatment that these Africans got once they became slaves.
  • While we today may see the slaves as people, back then, they were seen as possessions...Looking at the issue within the context of that time – what was so wrong with that?
  • There are well-documented cases of former black slaves, who, after gaining their freedom, becoming rich slave owners themselves.
  • Our African ancestors failed to take full advantage of the many opportunities that slavery offered them. The opportunities to adapt to new technologies, in particular, were never fully maximised. In many respects, the negative effects of slavery that are being claimed are of our own doing.
  • No doubt, for future generations, there will be injustices that we today see as normal. No generation, therefore, has the right to condemn another for its interpretation of right and wrong.
  • These proponents of reparations are not good historians as they allow their emotions and biases to cloud their better judgment. If we were to objectively look at the issue of slavery we will see no injustice and thus no need for reparations.
Readers may deduce as they wish of what the gentleman said. Yours truly would not comment other than as already done: by highlighting Dingwall's amazing assertations and, bladder now satisfactorily emptied, by wondering why Mr Dingwall hates himself thus? For only one who is ashamed of his genealogy would argue as he did.

Papa Manning holds court in the Senate. So what?

What's the fuss over Papa Manning coming to the Senate, when there arose no tangible popular furore over his jumping up from a barber's chair to go a-storming a media house?

Unnecessary hullabaloo over LGE vote.

Regarding the Senate debate of the Local Government Elections Bill 2k9, who is there amongst us that seriously believes --had the floor-vote count been tied-- that the President of the Senate would NOT have voted to break the deadlock in the way that Papa and Mama Manning favoured?

Gail's gall.

For now, seeing what Senator Gail did, all I'd say is that she's not full of Merhair, but also balls.

WICB, WIPA, All-Fours.

Good thing the West Indies Cricket Board doesn't play All-Fours? For, seeing as, in its dealings with the West Indies Players' Association, it's not prepared to negotiate under duress, between the lines it means that the only time it would stand up would be when it holds these five pieces of trumps: ace, king, queen, ten and deuce? Sigh!

Wednesday, 8 July 2009

For those who wish/still wish to lead Trinbago.

On July 7th, 2009, as the world watched in compassion at the Michael Jackson Memorial, President Barack Hussein Obama gave a seminal speech at the New Economic School Graduation Ceremony at the Gostinny Dvor, Moscow, Russia, in which he continued his odyssey of rewriting the charter of how the United States of America must relate with the rest of the world.

And, as with several of his earlier deliveries, Obama's Gostinny Dvor graduation dialogue strikes chords which resonate even in this neck-of-the-woods. For example, mutatis mutandis, the following excerpt appears directly to have been shaped then uttered with Trinbago's present-day and wannabe political leadership in mind:

"...So as we honor this past, we also recognize the future benefit that will come from a strong and vibrant Russia. Think of the issues that will define your lives: security from nuclear weapons and extremism; access to markets and opportunity; health and the environment; an international system that protects sovereignty and human rights, while promoting stability and prosperity. These challenges demand global partnership, and that partnership will be stronger if Russia occupies its rightful place as a great power.

Yet unfortunately, there is sometimes a sense that old assumptions must prevail, old ways of thinking; a conception of power that is rooted in the past rather than in the future. There is the 20th century view that the United States and Russia are destined to be antagonists, and that a strong Russia or a strong America can only assert themselves in opposition to one another. And there is a 19th century view that we are destined to vie for spheres of influence, and that great powers must forge competing blocs to balance one another.

These assumptions are wrong. In 2009, a great power does not show strength by dominating or demonizing other countries. The days when empires could treat sovereign states as pieces on a chess board are over. As I said in Cairo, given our independence, any world order that -- given our interdependence, any world order that tries to elevate one nation or one group of people over another will inevitably fail. The pursuit of power is no longer a zero-sum game -- progress must be shared.

That's why I have called for a "reset" in relations between the United States and Russia. This must be more than a fresh start between the Kremlin and the White House -- though that is important and I've had excellent discussions with both your President and your Prime Minister. It must be a sustained effort among the American and Russian people to identify mutual interests, and expand dialogue and cooperation that can pave the way to progress.

This will not be easy. It's difficult to forge a lasting partnership between former adversaries, it's hard to change habits that have been ingrained in our governments and our bureaucracies for decades. But I believe that on the fundamental issues that will shape this century, Americans and Russians share common interests that form a basis for cooperation. It is not for me to define Russia's national interests, but I can tell you about America's national interests, and I believe that you will see that we share common ground..."

Yet, again, to all those who wish/still wish to lead Trinbago out of the morass, I commend Obama's erudition. The full Moscow declamation may be had at the Obama Whitehouse's open-to-the-entire-world-and-very-easily-navigable website site at:

Hope this latest script is not destined to pop up before blind eyes.

United Airlines and Dave Carroll's broken guitar.

Dave Carrol's own story:

"On March 31, 2008 Sons of Maxwell began our week-long-tour of Nebraska by flying United Airlines from Halifax to Omaha, by way of Chicago.

On that first leg of the flight were seated at the rear of the aircraft and upon landing and waiting to deplane in order to make our connection a woman sitting behind me, not aware that we were musicians cried out: “My god they’re throwing guitars out there”.

Our bass player, Mike, looked out the window in time to see his bass being heaved without regard by the United baggage handlers. My $3500 710 Taylor had been thrown before his.

I immediately tried to communicate this to the flight attendant who cut me off saying: “Don’t talk to me. Talk to the lead agent outside!”

I found the person she pointed to and that lady was an “acting” lead agent but refused to talk to me and disappeared into the crowd saying “I’m not the lead agent!”

I spoke to a third employee at the gate and when I told her the baggage handlers were throwing expensive instruments outside she dismissed me saying, “But hun, that’s why we make you sign the waiver?”

I explained that I didn’t sign a waiver and that no waiver would excuse what was happening outside. She said to take it up with the ground crew in Omaha.

When I got to Omaha it was around 12:30 am. The plane was late arriving and there were no employees visible. Although I was told later that it wouldn’t have mattered, I should have taken my hard case out of the padded protective exterior case to examine the guitar at the airport but I didn’t. The guitar case looked ok and we were tired, went to the hotel and then to sleep for our early morning pick-up by the tour managers the next day.

When they picked us up in the early morning we would not be back in Omaha for seven days. It was later that day at sound check that I discovered that the base of my Taylor had been smashed. One week later I returned to Omaha for my return trip. I explained what had happened and the United agent in Omaha said I needed to start a claim at the airport where the trip began (Halifax). So here is what happened next...

...So after nine months it came down to a series of emails with Ms. Irlweg and, despite her refusal to introduce me to her supervisor, our conversations ended with her saying United would not be taking any responsibility for what had happened and that that would be the last email on the matter.

My final offer of a settlement of $1200 in flight vouchers, to cover my salvage costs repairing the Taylor, was rejected.

At that moment it occurred to me that I had been fighting a losing battle all this time and that fighting over this at all was a waste of time. The system is designed to frustrate affected customers into giving up their claims and United is very good at it. However I realized then that as a songwriter and traveling musician I wasn’t without options. In my final reply to Ms. Irlweg I told her that I would be writing three songs about United Airlines and my experience in the whole matter. I would then make videos for these songs and offer them for free download online, inviting viewers to vote on their favourite United song. My goal: to get one million hits in one year.

To date I have written “United: Song 1” and “United: Song 2” and I’m proud to now release the first video in the trilogy.

The response has been incredible so far. Everyone involved in the recording of the track and filming/editing of the video has volunteered their time and pre-production work is underway for the filming of United: Song 2 (hopefully to be released later this summer). United has demonstrated they know how to keep their airline in the forefront of their customer’s minds and I wanted this project to expand upon that satirically.

I’ve been done “being angry” for quite some time and, if anything, I should thank United. They’ve given me a creative outlet that has brought people together from around the world. We had a pile of laughs making the recording and the video while the images are spinning on how to make “United: Song 2” even better than the first. So, thanks United!

If my guitar had to be smashed due to extreme negligence I’m glad it was you that did it. Now sit back and enjoy the show.

"Read the full story (here) in Dave Carroll's own blog, then view the video:


Ptwahing on Mama Manning.

How insulting that someone whom no one voted into powerful office would apologize to us, the people, for using that office to deny us, the people, of our right to vote? (See: http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article_news?id=161501754)

Ptwah!

Tuesday, 7 July 2009

Local Government crap.

Just read the following that was excerpted from Trinidad Newsday's July 7, 2009 Editorial; it concerns the latest life extension given to Local Government bodies by the PNM-controlled House of Representatives and goes like this:
"...On the surface it really appears that the Government is afraid to face any kind of polls that could be used by many, including their own supporters, as a referendum on their performance at Central Government level..." (http://www.newsday.co.tt/editorial/0,103354.html)

How insightful of The Newsday. Thoroughly enjoyed their soothsaying.

Seriously though, since 2006, when announcing his administration's first intent to extend the life of Local Government Bodies, Prime Minister Manning premised that such course was inevitable as:
"...We are of the view that significantly improved Local Government is indispensable for the deepening of the democratic process and for the better delivery of services to the people of the nation. It is also critical for greater national efficiency and productivity which will in turn increase the competitiveness of Trinidad and Tobago in the global arena..." (Ibid.)

He then elaborated:
"...A Draft Policy Paper was formulated by the Ministry of Local Government in 2004, incorporating previous reports on Local Government Reform as well as the views, opinions and suggestions of individuals and institutions, including Municipal Corporations.

After review, this Paper was approved by Cabinet and published as a Green Paper for public comment. Thereafter, widespread consultations were held on this important matter.

Specifically, a two (2) day National Consultation and four (4) one day Regional Consultations were held between August and September, 2004. More than one thousand persons from a wide cross-section of the national community attended these Consultations..." (ASIDE: "widespread"? "More than (approximately) one thousand persons from a wide cross-section of the national community"? Hope you're listening, you Law-Association-bashing Colm Imbert?) (Ibid.)

Nutshell: three years ago, what the Prime Minister said amounted to a confession that, where Local Government reform in Trinidad and Tobago is concerned, bullcrap had been walking for a long time.

Now, July 6, 2009, up comes the Prime Minister's wife --just love how Uncle Jack put it: "Mama Manning"-- to say the same nonsense: that because
worse must be allowed to continue in local Local Governance, no local Local Government Elections can be held.

Mama Manning clearly does not understand that since her husband, the Prime Minister, dropped his bombshell back in 2006, it has been his administration's continued prevarication in the matter of Local Government reform, NOT denial of the right to choose, that has encouraged the scope of such bodies' excremental perambulation exponentially to increase? For though --as above highlighted-- the powers-that-be have long recognized the doltishness that parades as Local Government modus operandi, nary an interim thing has been done to improve the system. MG! It's like if a choke developed in a septic tank of a rented building, thus causing the foul contents to spill, yet, rather than call in the plumbers, the absentee owner remains quite content to let things run as they would --to the continued annoyance of his tenants and those in the vicinity-- all because his rents continue to come in on time and, all the while, too, he repeatedly promises those thus aggrieved that, next month, he'll build for them a new and better sewerage disposal system.


But, "next month" is "tomorrow" twenty-eight times removed, hence, "next month", too, never comes.

Recommendation: It's time we, the people, forcefully remind Mr. Manning and his crowd that Confucian wisdom, well-applied, will wreak wonders within a brief space of time: a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.

Sunday, 5 July 2009

Frankly speaking, Colm...

Previously, in looking at how Minister Colm Imbert derided the Trinidad and Tobago Law Association (LATT), focus was placed on his poor grasp of the basic tenets of democracy. (See: http://kid5rivers.blogspot.com/2009/07/despite-his-several-antisocial-ways.html). It's now time to ponder another aspect: the implications of his sacreligious rant on the very institution of which he is an elected member --the House of Representatives of Trinidad and Tobago (HORTT).

Colm --forgive the familiarity of referral: his perennial actions invite all to such-- evidently also holds every properly-constituted meeting --including that of HORTT-- in the same utmost disdain as the recent meeting of LATT in that, regarding the latter --no pun intended-- what he said may easily be applied to HORTT as follows, mutatis mutandis:
“If you look carefully at HORTT debates that take place at the Red House from time to time, of the 41 members normally attending and participating, the majority invariably comprises those 26 members who come from the People's National Movement (PNM), while the minority comprises those 15 who came from the United National Congress Alliance (UNCA).
So that if one looks very carefully at what happens at the end of those debates, approximately 26 would against any motion tabled by the UNCA side. The inescapable conclusion one must draw is that those 26 were persons politically opposed to the UNCA. Therefore every such vote has to be taken in such context. HORTT debates are never dispassionate discussions by a learned society, dealing with some academic or some esoteric thing: it is a group of politicians who have voted against another politician from an opposing political party.
In any event, there are approximately 1,350,000 citizens of Trinidad and Tobago, but there are only about 41 of them in HORTT! So, HORTT comprises just 0.003 percent of the population of Trinidad and Tobago. Does that answer all your questions as to the inclusiveness and national relevance of such an institution?”
(Source:
http://www.newsday.co.tt/news/0,103111.html)

How dastardly of Colm, vicariously, thus, to bite the hand that so well feeds him! And, too, of Attorney-General (AG) John Jeremie --Colm insisted that his LATT analysis originated with the AG!

By the John-inspired, Colm-mouthpieced sacreligious commentary, undeniably both parliamentarians have invited the good citizens of Trinbago to disrespect the Parliament of Trinidad and Tobago.

HORTT Speaker Barendra Sinanan is known to be severe in rewarding errant members who lap it up in breach of the Standing Orders, hence one may yet see Colm get his comeuppance.

Saturday, 4 July 2009

Franking Colm.

Despite his several antisocial ways, Colm Imbert must be commended for his unabashed frankness, such as, recently he displayed in analysing who-is-who, from the last Trinidad and Tobago Law Association meeting and anti-John-Jeremie vote. Left to Colm, "...approximately 100 persons voted for this motion of no confidence against the Attorney General and the inescapable conclusion that one must draw is that most of that 100 (read that as "approximately 100") were persons politically opposed to the People's National Movement. And therefore the vote must be taken in context. It was not a dispassionate discussion by a learned society dealing with some academic or esoteric thing. It was a group of politicians who voted against other politician from an opposing political party."
Thanks to Colm's frankness, one now has a very accurate headcount of the PNM lawyers.
On a related and closing note: it's difficult to grasp how a longstanding elected Member of Parliament cannot understand what democracy is, or, worse yet, how democracy works.

Hazel and her revolutionary notions.

Prime ministerial wife cum Local Government Minister in her latter capacity advised the nation that "a revolutionary move" is about to be made. She was, of course, referring to the never-heard-of-before-anywhere-in-the-world concept of investing elected representatives with executive power.
No, Hazel! That's NOT what would be revolutionary! Now! On the other hand, if Trinbagonians were to ups and run every last one of you and your kind outta town, then, THAT would be! ¡Ya espero la revolución!

"Privilege" me, too!


The decision of Speaker Barendra Sinanan --to haul the Trinidad Newsday before the Privileges Committee-- is one which needs strongly to be opposed, if only for the reason that, in this 21st-century day and age, it is, indeed, most loathsome that anything of the people's business --discussions in the people's Parliament-- must be known only to a privileged few, even moreso when the matter being reported was discussed in the full glare of the media and under the watchful eye of the public gallery. Furthermore, it's discombobulating that, of all persons, the Minister of INFORMATION would be the one who'd intitiate the move to bring The Newsday to book!
To me, therefore, the contempt was committed NOT by the Newsday, but by all who initiated then voted for the Newsday's reprimand. I'd consider it a welcome privilege if the Speaker were to "privilege" me, too, for this, my open contempt of their actions! In any event, in future if the Minister of INFORMATION or his buttresses need to keep things to themselves, then ask the media and other guests in the public gallery to leave the Chamber.

Thursday, 2 July 2009

Quixotic Prime Ministerial signals.

It's more than passing curious that The Fatherly One would insist the Privy Council must now take aside --because it's time Trinbagonians start fending for themselves-- yet, simultaneously, would refuse to apply the same logic where spending our, the people's, money to build local physical infrastructure is concerned.

Wednesday, 1 July 2009

Just another excuse for not responding.

The fear is that the re-introduction of bicycling cops will serve only to furnish the lacklustre amongst them with a new excuse for not responding --"Sorry! No bicycles in the station now! So, take two panadol!"
http://www.newsday.co.tt/crime_and_court/0,102975.html